Reviewer Y Lee
well made but I needed to purchase insoles for my high arches and wide foot
Reviewer K Foote
Having worn 574s for about 15 years I was interested to try the 373. The main difference is in the overall bulk of the shoe. The 373 is much more form fitting with a slightly lower ankle and slightly thinner sole. Comfort is comparable in both shoes, but from a fashion point of view they compliment clothes differently. The 373 I wear with slimmer jeans that have smaller cuffs, which I still prefer the 574 when wearing a boot cut jean or shorts.
Reviewer trevstonlongworth
I normally only wear 574's from New Balance, but I purchased these because they share the same shoe last and they're similar. I can't say that I like them as well, but they're alright.
I believe the mid-soles are different, and while I think I like the 574 mid-sole better, the 565 doesn't seem bad. One thing I definitely don't like as well is the lack of mesh in the all-suede upper. They probably don't breath as well, but that's not a huge factor for me in a suede shoe. I just like the looks of the mesh/suede combo better then the all-suede shoe.
I saved my final criticism for last, because it applies to both the 565 and 574 models of "Lifestyle and Retro" shoes. These are the ones with model numbers that start with "ml". I don't like them because they appear to be the hipster version of New Balance shoes, with laces that usually match the suede. Like any good hipster shoe, they seem to be more narrow, which is antithetical to the very thing that made the 574, and probably 565, popular shoes in the first place (i.e. spacious.) Even though these are supposedly made on the same shoe last as other models in the line, they definitely don't have the advertised toe depth of the SL-2 shoe last. I've also noticed that many New Balance shoes made on the SL-2 last don't seem to be as wide as they used to be, so that issue probably isn't for the lifestyle and retro shoes alone.
Seems strange that New Balance would ruin a popular line of shoes by changing the very things that made them popular, but that's what they seem to be doing. For customers that want a more narrow 574, it seems like New Balance would just suggest the 363 or one of their models made on narrow shoe lasts. Regardless, I wish they'd leave the SL-2 shoes alone, so that customer who appreciate them can continue to do so. I've worn them for 20 years and the only thing that will stop that is if New Balance changes the shoes so much that they're not the same.
Reviewer Andrew S Cofrin
They fit true to size, they are comfortable, and the color (blue71) is so awesome. For $20, they are great. My only complaint is that one of the shoes is not centered, so the laces are off center. It's not enough to cost a star or send them back, I mean they're 20 bucks, you can't expect them to be perfect...
Reviewer dan patridge
These shoes fit great and are so comfy. They are a good shoe with jeans or khakis. The order was shipped quick and arrived fast, thanks
Reviewer LI NY Prof
Hubby likes them alot, he wants themnin other colors!
Reviewer S Clancy
These shoes are extremely lightweight and fit perfect.
Reviewer Everett Green
I'm already wearing other Rockport sneakers. It is very comfortable and wears well. These sneakers are also very comfortable.
Reviewer Ziraben
Great shoe very good fit
Reviewer slbcincy
For what appears to be a value branded tennis shoe, they are really great for every day tasks and extended wear.
I’ve taken these shoes out a few times in various capacities (errands, hiking, work, etc) and they have performed wonderfully in all but heavy running. They have a great look to them and are understated. Perfect for anyone who prefers classic lines and black shoes. The soles are on the thinner side and the support is minimal but, are better than most bargain based shoes I’ve experienced in the past. They held up well in the rain and even on slick floors.
Would recommend these shoes for anyone looking for a decent pair of black tennis shoes.
Show14-
140(Results:
1142)